MOTI vs. IFLO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, MOTI returned -1.14% vs 32.28% for IFLO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTI charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

MOTI vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -10.72% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.

MOTI

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -6.49%
• YTD: -10.72%
• 6M: -10.41%
• 1Y: -1.14%
• 3Y*: 5.18%
• 5Y*: 1.53%
• 10Y*: 6.80%

IFLO

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 16.93%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 32.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTI vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF	-10.72%	10.73%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	16.93%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTI and IFLO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.68

MOTI vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTI	IFLO
Industrials	23.0%	18.1%
Consumer Defensive	20.9%	2.8%
Healthcare	13.0%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	13.8%
Technology	10.6%	21.5%
Basic Materials	9.3%	11.3%
Communication Services	7.3%	6.7%
Financial Services	3.4%	1.1%
Energy	-	12.1%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

MOTI vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTI

MOTI Risk / Return Rank: 8
MOTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MOTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
MOTI Omega Ratio Rank: 8
MOTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MOTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8

IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTI vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTI	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	—	—

Drawdowns

MOTI vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTI	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-6.44%	-30.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.95%	-6.44%	-9.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.95%	-3.37%	-12.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.15%	-1.25%	-7.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOTI	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.35%	14.75%	-0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.54%	14.75%	+2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.82%	14.75%	+3.07%

MOTI vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTI vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.51%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF	3.61%	3.22%	4.79%	2.34%	3.27%	4.67%	2.14%	3.90%	3.73%	8.87%	1.33%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTI and IFLO in my portfolio?

MOTI and IFLO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MOTI or IFLO?

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs -1.14% for MOTI. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTI or IFLO?

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs -1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTI or IFLO?

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTI or IFLO?

MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

What is the main difference between MOTI and IFLO?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.56% for IFLO.