PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTI vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTI vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 16.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MOTI has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 7.05%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.


MOTI

1D
0.32%
1M
7.79%
6M
-2.03%
YTD
0.88%
1Y
9.33%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
7.05%
ALL TIME*
5.44%

IDOG

1D
-0.41%
1M
4.67%
6M
7.64%
YTD
16.48%
1Y
33.54%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
10.95%
ALL TIME*
8.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.99M$1.52M$1.26M
$159.40K$183.16K$337.60K

MOTI vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
0.88%25.01%1.94%10.18%-6.93%0.03%7.24%17.63%-13.92%34.27%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
16.48%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTI and IDOG is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between MOTI and IDOG has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOTI vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTI
IDOG

Industrials

23.2%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

22.8%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.1%

Technology

11.3%
7.7%

Healthcare

10.7%
10.4%

Communication Services

7.4%
9.5%

Basic Materials

6.8%
9.8%

Financial Services

4.4%
10.6%

Energy

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

10.2%

Industrials

MOTI
23.2%
IDOG
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOTI
22.8%
IDOG
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTI
13.4%
IDOG
10.1%

Technology

MOTI
11.3%
IDOG
7.7%

Healthcare

MOTI
10.7%
IDOG
10.4%

Communication Services

MOTI
7.4%
IDOG
9.5%

Basic Materials

MOTI
6.8%
IDOG
9.8%

Financial Services

MOTI
4.4%
IDOG
10.6%

Energy

MOTI

-

IDOG
9.2%

Real Estate

MOTI

-

IDOG

-

Utilities

MOTI

-

IDOG
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTI vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTI
MOTI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MOTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTI vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOTIIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

5.20

-4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

16.14

-14.90

MOTI vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTI and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTI vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, roughly equal to the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTIIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-37.32%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.95%

-6.47%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-13.92%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.71%

-25.31%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-37.32%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-0.41%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-7.86%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

2.08%

+5.46%

Volatility

MOTI vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 2.74%. This indicates that MOTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTIIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

2.74%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

10.73%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

13.34%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.66%

15.64%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

17.09%

+0.71%

MOTI vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTI vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than IDOG's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.22%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
3.19%3.22%4.79%2.34%3.27%4.67%2.14%3.90%3.73%8.87%1.33%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTI and IDOG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOTI has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to IDOG (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 10.95% vs 7.05% for MOTI. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 3.19% for MOTI.

MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTI and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer