MOTG vs. YCS
MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 7.49%/yr vs 23.10%/yr for YCS. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
MOTG vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 5.42% return.
MOTG
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.96%
YCS
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.45%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.07K | $24.07K | $42.57K | |
| $2.54M | $2.29M | $1.59M |
MOTG vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 6.17% | 26.06% | 9.31% | 11.00% | -11.34% | 14.68% | 16.06% | 30.43% | -3.89% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 5.42% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and YCS is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018 | -0.05 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MOTG and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTG vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
MOTG
YCS
MOTG vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.78 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 10.25 | -7.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -49.56% | +17.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -8.48% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.59% | -23.05% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.29% | -27.32% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.32% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -19.75% | +14.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 2.29% | +2.14% |
Volatility
MOTG vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 3.57%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 5.95% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 11.87% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 16.44% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 21.21% | -5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 18.61% | -0.85% |
MOTG vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTG vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.72%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 16.72% | 17.75% | 5.60% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 3.91% | 0.45% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTG and YCS have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to MOTG (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.10% vs 7.49% for MOTG. On fees, MOTG is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.10% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOTG is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 16.72%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTG and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer