MOTG vs. USO
MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 6.27%/yr vs 24.41%/yr for USO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
MOTG vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
MOTG
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 9.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
MOTG vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | -1.12% | 26.06% | 9.31% | 11.00% | -11.34% | 14.68% | 16.06% | 30.43% | -3.89% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and USO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018 | 0.15 |
The correlation between MOTG and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTG vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
MOTG
USO
MOTG vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOTG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.38 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 5.01 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 9.42 | -6.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOTG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 2.31 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.68 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | -0.18 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -98.19% | +66.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -20.39% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -26.05% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.29% | -36.23% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -85.01% | +78.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -75.30% | +70.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 10.82% | -7.12% |
Volatility
MOTG vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 4.58%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 14.87% | -10.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 38.23% | -27.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 44.20% | -30.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 36.06% | -20.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 39.00% | -21.15% |
MOTG vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTG vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 17.95% | 17.75% | 5.60% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 3.91% | 0.45% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTG and USO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to MOTG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 5-year performance, USO leads with 24.41% vs 6.27% for MOTG. On fees, MOTG is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 24.41% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOTG is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTG and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer