MOTG vs. IOO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO).
MOTG and IOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOTG is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2018. IOO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2000. Both MOTG and IOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MOTG or IOO.
Performance
MOTG vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 24.15% return.
MOTG
10.31%
-3.09%
4.55%
18.25%
8.53%
N/A
IOO
24.15%
-1.45%
7.80%
28.46%
15.79%
11.99%
Key characteristics
| MOTG | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.58 | 2.05 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.23 | 2.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.75 | 2.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.51 | 10.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.15% | 2.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.62% | 13.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.82% | -55.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.04% | -2.28% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOTG vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and IOO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MOTG vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MOTG vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than IOO's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 1.68% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 2.35% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 1.09% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% | 3.52% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and IOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MOTG vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 3.28%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.