PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOTG vs. ACWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOTG vs. ACWV

Last updated Aug 5, 2026
Documentation

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MOTG tracks the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 7.49%/yr vs 5.84%/yr for ACWV. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

MOTG vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 6.67% return.

MOTG

1D
1.36%
1M
6.68%
6M
3.28%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
12.74%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
11.96%

ACWV

1D
0.85%
1M
2.87%
6M
4.49%
YTD
6.67%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
7.31%
ALL TIME*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

ACWV

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
$12.68M$11.33M$12.51M

MOTG

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
$14.07K$24.07K$42.57K

MOTG vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF		6.17%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%30.43%-3.89%
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF		6.67%11.04%11.38%8.23%-10.36%13.97%3.04%21.04%-1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and ACWV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.79

The correlation between MOTG and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTG vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOTG
ACWV

Industrials

25.3%
8.1%

Technology

18.8%
25.3%

Consumer Defensive

17.7%
9.7%

Healthcare

16.0%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
5.3%

Financial Services

7.0%
13.5%

Communication Services

5.6%
11.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.5%

Energy

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

7.5%

Industrials

MOTG
25.3%
ACWV
8.1%

Technology

MOTG
18.8%
ACWV
25.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
17.7%
ACWV
9.7%

Healthcare

MOTG
16.0%
ACWV
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
8.5%
ACWV
5.3%

Financial Services

MOTG
7.0%
ACWV
13.5%

Communication Services

MOTG
5.6%
ACWV
11.3%

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.2%
ACWV
1.5%

Energy

MOTG

-

ACWV
3.5%

Real Estate

MOTG

-

ACWV
0.6%

Utilities

MOTG

-

ACWV
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

Often compared with MOTG:
MOTG vs. MOATMOTG vs. MOTIMOTG vs. ACWIMOTG vs. GCOWMOTG vs. SPYMOTG vs. XDEB.DEMOTG vs. EATZ
Often compared with ACWV:
ACWV vs. USMVACWV vs. VTACWV vs. MVOL.LACWV vs. EFAVACWV vs. SPLVACWV vs. VOOACWV vs. XMW.TO

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWV
ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTG vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MOTGACWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.90
1.08

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.37
1.61

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

1.36

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

3.85

-0.97

MOTG vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and ACWV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOTGACWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-28.82%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-6.37%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-7.56%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

-18.14%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.82%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-3.10%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

2.24%

+2.19%

Volatility

MOTG vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.44%. This indicates that MOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOTGACWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

2.44%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

6.45%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

8.07%

+6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

10.31%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

12.31%

+5.45%

MOTG vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.72%, more than ACWV's 1.88% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF		1.88%2.09%2.33%2.41%2.18%1.92%1.77%2.54%2.32%2.04%2.56%2.28%
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF		16.72%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOTG and ACWV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOTG has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to ACWV (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

On 5-year performance, MOTG leads with 7.49% vs 5.84% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOTG has performed better with a 7.49% return vs 5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 16.72%, compared with 1.88% for ACWV.

MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.20% for ACWV.

ACWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and ACWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer