MOTG vs. ACWV

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MOTG tracks the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 6.86%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for ACWV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

MOTG vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 2.80% return.

MOTG

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: -3.91%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 1Y: 8.49%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 2.80%
• 1Y: 5.98%
• 3Y*: 9.51%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 6.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	0.53%	26.06%	9.31%	11.00%	-11.34%	14.68%	16.06%	30.43%	-3.89%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.80%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and ACWV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018	0.80

The correlation between MOTG and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTG vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTG	ACWV
Industrials	26.3%	8.1%
Technology	19.3%	25.8%
Consumer Defensive	16.8%	9.8%
Healthcare	14.1%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	5.1%
Communication Services	6.6%	11.9%
Financial Services	6.3%	13.2%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.5%
Energy	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	7.3%

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTG

MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 20
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 24
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 23
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTG	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.75	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	1.12	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.14	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	0.94	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	2.69	-0.73

MOTG vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTG	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.82%	-28.82%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	-6.37%	-6.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	-7.56%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.29%	-18.14%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.98%	-2.50%	-2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-3.11%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	2.23%	+2.10%

Volatility

MOTG vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOTG	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	3.20%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	6.26%	+5.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.19%	8.08%	+6.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.91%	10.28%	+5.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.79%	12.29%	+5.50%

MOTG vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.66%, more than ACWV's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.95%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	17.66%	17.75%	5.60%	1.86%	3.64%	5.88%	2.96%	3.91%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTG and ACWV in my portfolio?

MOTG and ACWV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOTG or ACWV?

ACWV has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to MOTG (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, MOTG or ACWV?

On 5-year performance, MOTG leads with 6.86% vs 5.31% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTG or ACWV?

Over the 5-year period, MOTG has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTG or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTG or ACWV?

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.66%, compared with 1.95% for ACWV.

What is the main difference between MOTG and ACWV?

MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.