ACWV vs. XMW.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO).

ACWV and XMW.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. XMW.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jul 24, 2012. Both ACWV and XMW.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	0.64%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF	0.02%	10.91%	10.56%	7.07%	-10.73%	13.63%	2.52%	20.47%	-2.28%	17.80%

Different Trading Currencies

ACWV is traded in USD, while XMW.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XMW.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than XMW.TO's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWV has outperformed XMW.TO with an annualized return of 7.34%, while XMW.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.66% annualized return.

ACWV

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.54%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 7.34%

XMW.TO

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -4.58%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: 5.38%
• 10Y*: 6.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XMW.TO's 0.48% expense ratio.

XMW.TO

iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF

ACWV

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

Return for Risk

ACWV vs. XMW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 30
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

XMW.TO

XMW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 13
XMW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XMW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XMW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XMW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
XMW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACWV	XMW.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.36	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	0.55	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.08	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	0.55	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	2.66	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWV Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the XMW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWV and XMW.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACWV	XMW.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.36	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.53	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.54	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.62	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between ACWV and XMW.TO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Dividend Comparison

ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than XMW.TO's 1.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.07%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF	1.56%	1.58%	1.81%	1.98%	1.66%	1.43%	1.52%	2.20%	2.01%	1.61%	2.02%	1.85%

Drawdowns

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, roughly equal to the maximum XMW.TO drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and XMW.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWV	XMW.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	-21.42%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.56%	-8.10%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.14%	-14.45%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.82%	-21.42%	-7.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.54%	-2.77%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.11%	-2.75%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	2.72%	-0.99%

Volatility

ACWV vs. XMW.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWV	XMW.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	3.32%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.54%	5.62%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.76%	10.60%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.25%	10.27%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.31%	12.45%	-0.14%