MOOD vs. HERD
MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while HERD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. MOOD is actively managed, while HERD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOOD returned 19.14%/yr vs 14.59%/yr for HERD. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.73% expense ratio.
Performance
MOOD vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 14.97% return.
MOOD
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.16%
HERD
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 28.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $194.03K | $197.87K | $182.95K | |
| $594.91K | $566.29K | $735.34K |
MOOD vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 13.27% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -3.31% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 14.97% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOOD and HERD is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MOOD and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOOD vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOOD
HERD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
MOOD
HERD
Financial Services
MOOD
HERD
Industrials
MOOD
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
MOOD
HERD
Healthcare
MOOD
HERD
Communication Services
MOOD
HERD
Basic Materials
MOOD
HERD
Consumer Defensive
MOOD
HERD
Energy
MOOD
HERD
Utilities
MOOD
HERD
Real Estate
MOOD
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOOD vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
MOOD
HERD
MOOD vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOOD | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 5.01 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 15.56 | -5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOOD vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOOD | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -39.41% | +25.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -5.68% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -18.90% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -0.70% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -4.50% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 1.83% | +1.37% |
Volatility
MOOD vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is 2.45%, while Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that MOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOOD | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 3.60% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 8.72% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 11.83% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 17.68% | -5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 20.36% | -8.27% |
MOOD vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MOOD and HERD have an expense ratio of 0.73%.
Dividends
MOOD vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than HERD's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 2.73% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOOD and HERD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERD has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to MOOD (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.14% vs 14.59% for HERD. Both ETFs have the same 0.73% expense ratio. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 14.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOOD and HERD have the same expense ratio: 0.73% per year.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.
MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while HERD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Pacer.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOOD and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer