MOOD vs. GDT
MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOOD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
MOOD vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MOOD
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 16.94%
- 1Y
- 36.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOOD vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 4.76% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -7.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOOD and GDT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOOD vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
MOOD
GDT
MOOD vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOOD | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOOD | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | -0.58 | +1.94 |
Drawdowns
MOOD vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -18.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOOD | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -18.06% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -15.59% | +15.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -9.96% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility
MOOD vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOOD | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 33.20% | -19.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 33.20% | -21.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 33.20% | -21.14% |
MOOD vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOOD vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than GDT's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOOD and GDT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.35% for MOOD.
They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOOD and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for MOOD and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer