PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOO vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOO vs. VTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MOO tracks the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOO returned 7.00%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for VTI. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

MOO vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MOO has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 7.00%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.

MOO

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.54%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
7.00%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		10.10%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%14.59%22.29%-6.03%21.75%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and VTI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between MOO and VTI has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOO vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOO
VTI

Consumer Defensive

37.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

26.2%
2.0%

Industrials

20.3%
9.8%

Healthcare

15.4%
9.2%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Energy

-

3.7%

Financial Services

-

12.0%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

33.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOO
37.9%
VTI
4.7%

Basic Materials

MOO
26.2%
VTI
2.0%

Industrials

MOO
20.3%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

MOO
15.4%
VTI
9.2%

Communication Services

MOO

-

VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MOO

-

VTI
10.0%

Energy

MOO

-

VTI
3.7%

Financial Services

MOO

-

VTI
12.0%

Real Estate

MOO

-

VTI
2.4%

Technology

MOO

-

VTI
33.5%

Utilities

MOO

-

VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Often compared with MOO:
MOO vs. VEGIMOO vs. DBAMOO vs. KROPMOO vs. SPYMOO vs. VOOMOO vs. PHOMOO vs. FTAG
Often compared with VTI:
VTI vs. VOOVTI vs. VXUSVTI vs. SPYVTI vs. VTVTI vs. SCHDVTI vs. FZROXVTI vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

MOO vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MOOVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.95
2.33

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.43
3.18

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.17

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

14.62

-10.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOO vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MOOVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.33

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.73

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.82

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.51

-0.28

Drawdowns

MOO vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and VTI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOOVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-55.45%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-8.92%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-19.30%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

-25.36%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

-35.00%

-4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.50%

-0.72%

-16.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-8.03%

-8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.93%

+1.44%

Volatility

MOO vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOOVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

2.96%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

9.13%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

12.17%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

17.40%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.30%

-0.11%

MOO vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		2.24%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOO and VTI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOO has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs 7.00% for MOO. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOO and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer