PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOO vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOO vs. VFMV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOO is a Natural Resources fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while VFMV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by Vanguard. MOO is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOO returned 0.10%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for VFMV. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.

Performance

MOO vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 11.10% return.

MOO

1D
-2.16%
1M
1.00%
6M
1.76%
YTD
12.27%
1Y
16.07%
3Y*
0.90%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
7.40%
ALL TIME*
5.50%

VFMV

1D
0.45%
1M
2.10%
6M
7.34%
YTD
11.10%
1Y
16.07%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF
$14.26M$13.98M$22.17M

VFMV

Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
$1.77M$2.11M$2.29M

MOO vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		12.27%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%14.59%22.29%-6.06%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF		11.10%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and VFMV is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.68

The correlation between MOO and VFMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOO vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOO
VFMV

Consumer Defensive

33.4%
9.5%

Basic Materials

26.1%

-

Industrials

23.7%
10.1%

Healthcare

16.8%
10.1%

Communication Services

-

10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.9%

Energy

-

3.9%

Financial Services

-

10.6%

Real Estate

-

6.4%

Technology

-

25.1%

Utilities

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

MOO
33.4%
VFMV
9.5%

Basic Materials

MOO
26.1%
VFMV

-

Industrials

MOO
23.7%
VFMV
10.1%

Healthcare

MOO
16.8%
VFMV
10.1%

Communication Services

MOO

-

VFMV
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MOO

-

VFMV
6.9%

Energy

MOO

-

VFMV
3.9%

Financial Services

MOO

-

VFMV
10.6%

Real Estate

MOO

-

VFMV
6.4%

Technology

MOO

-

VFMV
25.1%

Utilities

MOO

-

VFMV
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF

Often compared with MOO:
MOO vs. VEGIMOO vs. DBAMOO vs. KROPMOO vs. SPYMOO vs. VOOMOO vs. PHOMOO vs. FTAG
Often compared with VFMV:
VFMV vs. USMVVFMV vs. VOOVFMV vs. SCHDVFMV vs. VYMVFMV vs. VIGVFMV vs. VFMFVFMV vs. SPY

Return for Risk

MOO vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOO vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MOOVFMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.09
1.76

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.63
2.55

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.61

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

10.07

-6.48

MOO vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOO vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and VFMV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOOVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-33.64%

-35.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-6.00%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-10.35%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

-15.41%

-24.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.87%

-1.16%

-14.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-3.59%

-13.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

1.56%

+2.77%

Volatility

MOO vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.73%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOOVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

2.73%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

6.57%

+4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

8.96%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

11.76%

+5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

14.16%

+3.98%

MOO vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than VFMV's 1.74% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		2.20%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF		1.74%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOO and VFMV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOO has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to VFMV (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.39% vs 0.10% for MOO. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for MOO.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.74% for VFMV.

MOO is categorized as Natural Resources, while VFMV is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for MOO and 0.13% for VFMV.

VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOO and VFMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer