MOO vs. PWC
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC).
MOO and PWC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOO is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007. PWC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. It was launched on May 1, 2003. Both MOO and PWC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MOO vs. PWC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MOO vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 16.09% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | -8.10% | 23.99% | 14.59% | 22.29% | -6.03% | 21.75% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 2.60% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 20.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 16.09% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MOO has underperformed PWC with an annualized return of 8.26%, while PWC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.
MOO
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 16.09%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
PWC
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 6.46%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOO vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MOO vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank
MOO
PWC
MOO vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOO | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 0.46 | +1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 0.74 | +1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.70 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 3.23 | +5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOO | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.46 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.41 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.49 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.11 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MOO and PWC is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MOO vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison
MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than PWC's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.13% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 1.73% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
MOO vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and PWC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOO | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.53% | -78.13% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -11.26% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.52% | -26.58% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -39.45% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.01% | -5.36% | -7.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.99% | -36.46% | +19.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.45% | +0.64% |
Volatility
MOO vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 3.07%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MOO | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 3.07% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 7.37% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 14.30% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 16.29% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 18.84% | -0.64% |