MODL vs. IUSV
MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MODL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Victory, while IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index. MODL is actively managed, while IUSV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MODL returned 20.33%/yr vs 15.76%/yr for IUSV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSV.
Performance
MODL vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MODL having a 7.80% return and IUSV slightly higher at 8.03%.
MODL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
MODL vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 7.80% | 18.99% | 24.73% | 23.74% | 7.13% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 8.03% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | 12.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MODL and IUSV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MODL and IUSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
MODL vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MODL
IUSV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MODL
IUSV
Financial Services
MODL
IUSV
Communication Services
MODL
IUSV
Healthcare
MODL
IUSV
Consumer Cyclical
MODL
IUSV
Consumer Defensive
MODL
IUSV
Utilities
MODL
IUSV
Industrials
MODL
IUSV
Energy
MODL
IUSV
Basic Materials
MODL
-
IUSV
Real Estate
MODL
-
IUSV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MODL vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank
MODL
IUSV
MODL vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MODL | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 2.26 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 3.17 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.57 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 13.68 | -1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MODL | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.26 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.60 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
MODL vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum IUSV drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and IUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MODL | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -56.88% | +39.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -6.36% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -17.76% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.14% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -6.29% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.66% | +0.44% |
Volatility
MODL vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 2.24%. This indicates that MODL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MODL | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.24% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 7.14% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 9.97% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 14.55% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 17.07% | -2.48% |
MODL vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MODL vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison
MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than IUSV's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 0.67% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 1.02% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MODL and IUSV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MODL has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to IUSV (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MODL dropped -17.60% vs IUSV's -56.88%.
On 3-year performance, MODL leads with 20.33% vs 15.76% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MODL has performed better with a 20.33% return vs 15.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MODL.
IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.67% for MODL.
MODL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.04% for IUSV.
IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MODL and IUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer