MODL vs. COMT
MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MODL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Victory, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. MODL is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MODL returned 19.04%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for COMT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
MODL vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.
MODL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 26.18%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
MODL vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 8.88% | 18.99% | 24.73% | 23.74% | 6.45% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.19% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | -3.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MODL and COMT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.02 |
The correlation between MODL and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MODL vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
MODL
COMT
MODL vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MODL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.90 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 6.35 | +2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MODL vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MODL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -51.89% | +34.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -17.57% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -17.57% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -11.28% | +10.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -23.95% | +21.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 5.24% | -3.09% |
Volatility
MODL vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) is 2.89%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that MODL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MODL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 5.91% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 19.67% | -10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 21.54% | -9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 21.20% | -6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 18.85% | -4.30% |
MODL vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MODL vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.95% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 1.02% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MODL and COMT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to MODL (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MODL dropped -17.60% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, MODL leads with 19.04% vs 12.71% for COMT. On fees, MODL is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MODL has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MODL has performed better with a 19.04% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MODL is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.69% for MODL.
MODL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Victory and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.48% for COMT.
MODL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MODL and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer