MODL vs. AFOS
MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
MODL vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.42% return.
MODL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 32.42%
- 6M
- 37.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MODL vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 7.80% | 11.99% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.42% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MODL and AFOS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MODL vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
MODL
AFOS
MODL vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MODL | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MODL | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 4.39 | -2.81 |
Drawdowns
MODL vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MODL | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -11.52% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -1.38% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | — | — |
Volatility
MODL vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MODL | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 20.22% | -9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 20.22% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 20.22% | -5.63% |
MODL vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MODL vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 0.67% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 1.02% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MODL and AFOS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MODL.
MODL has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: Victory and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for MODL and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer