PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. MOTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT vs. MOTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than MOTG's 3.60% return.


MOAT

1D
0.23%
1M
1.68%
6M
3.18%
YTD
4.36%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
13.81%

MOTG

1D
0.13%
1M
4.10%
6M
0.04%
YTD
3.60%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.74M$67.48M$82.03M
$12.56K$25.37K$44.36K

MOAT vs. MOTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
4.36%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-4.78%
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
3.60%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%30.43%-3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and MOTG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.87

The correlation between MOAT and MOTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOAT vs. MOTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOAT
MOTG

Technology

30.8%
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

18.2%
17.7%

Healthcare

18.1%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
8.5%

Industrials

9.5%
25.3%

Financial Services

9.2%
7.0%

Communication Services

2.4%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MOAT
30.8%
MOTG
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT
18.2%
MOTG
17.7%

Healthcare

MOAT
18.1%
MOTG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT
11.1%
MOTG
8.5%

Industrials

MOAT
9.5%
MOTG
25.3%

Financial Services

MOAT
9.2%
MOTG
7.0%

Communication Services

MOAT
2.4%
MOTG
5.6%

Real Estate

MOAT
0.7%
MOTG

-

Basic Materials

MOAT

-

MOTG
1.2%

Energy

MOAT

-

MOTG

-

Utilities

MOAT

-

MOTG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. MOTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOAT vs. MOTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOATMOTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.84

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

2.39

+0.78

MOAT vs. MOTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the MOTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and MOTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. MOTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, roughly equal to the maximum MOTG drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and MOTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATMOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-31.82%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-12.56%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-14.59%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-24.29%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-2.08%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-4.97%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

4.43%

-0.27%

Volatility

MOAT vs. MOTG - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) at 3.46%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOATMOTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.46%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

11.57%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

14.19%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

15.90%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

17.76%

+0.86%

MOAT vs. MOTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTG's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT vs. MOTG - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than MOTG's 17.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.30%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
17.14%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT and MOTG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to MOTG (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs MOTG's -31.82%.

On 5-year performance, MOAT leads with 8.70% vs 7.23% for MOTG. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.14%, compared with 1.30% for MOAT.

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MOTG is Global Equities. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.52% for MOTG.

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and MOTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer