MNZL vs. YCS
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
MNZL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.78% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
MNZL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.40% | 3.37% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and YCS is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YCS
MNZL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -49.56% | +39.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -19.88% | +18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 16.96% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 21.10% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 18.96% | -2.20% |
MNZL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and YCS have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
MNZL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Manzil and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 1.00% for YCS.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer