PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNZL vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNZL vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 17.40% return.


MNZL

1D
0.08%
1M
1.36%
YTD
15.65%
6M
13.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-1.46%
1M
-6.59%
YTD
17.40%
6M
17.10%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
4.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNZL vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MNZL and FAAR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNZL vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNZL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNZL vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNZLFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

MNZL vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNZL vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNZLFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-18.03%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-7.66%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-7.82%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

Volatility

MNZL vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNZLFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

13.30%

+3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

12.97%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

11.55%

+5.43%

MNZL vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNZL vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than FAAR's 9.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.80%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
MNZL
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNZL and FAAR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.80%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.

MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.95% for FAAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNZL and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer