MNZL vs. CAOS
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. MNZL is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
MNZL vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.81M | $5.39M | $5.09M | |
| $286.75K | $311.28K | $280.55K |
MNZL vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 13.16% | 3.37% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.76% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and CAOS is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CAOS
MNZL vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -3.89% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -1.13% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | -0.92% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 1.57% | +15.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 4.18% | +12.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 4.18% | +12.85% |
MNZL vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and CAOS have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
MNZL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.63% for CAOS.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer