MNY.TO vs. HACK
Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK).
MNY.TO and HACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MNY.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Sep 14, 2022. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014.
Performance
MNY.TO vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNY.TO vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 0.54% | 3.03% | 4.69% | 5.03% | 1.54% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | -4.02% | 3.02% | 34.10% | 34.41% | -3.68% |
Different Trading Currencies
MNY.TO is traded in CAD, while HACK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HACK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNY.TO achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than HACK's -4.02% return.
MNY.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -12.72%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNY.TO vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNY.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNY.TO vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
MNY.TO
HACK
MNY.TO vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNY.TO | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 15.32 | 0.09 | +15.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 52.67 | 0.30 | +52.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 19.96 | 1.04 | +18.92 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 67.75 | 0.11 | +67.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 622.62 | 0.29 | +622.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNY.TO | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32 | 0.09 | +15.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.02 | 0.59 | +10.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNY.TO and HACK is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MNY.TO vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
MNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than HACK's 0.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 2.67% | 2.93% | 4.71% | 4.85% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
MNY.TO vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNY.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNY.TO and HACK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNY.TO | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -42.68% | +42.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -20.67% | +20.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.52% | +14.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -11.70% | +11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 7.81% | -7.81% |
Volatility
MNY.TO vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) is 0.03%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that MNY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNY.TO | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.03% | 8.08% | -8.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 17.15% | -17.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18% | 25.61% | -25.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 21.83% | -21.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 21.55% | -21.17% |