MNVT vs. WBIF

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

MNVT vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MNVT

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -14.18%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 2.45%
• 6M: 15.29%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 1Y: 23.03%
• 3Y*: 7.87%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 5.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNVT vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MNVT Moonvest ETF	19.73%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MNVT and WBIF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

MNVT vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNVT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 72
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNVT vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNVT	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.86	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.42	—

Drawdowns

MNVT vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNVT	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-20.29%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.18%	-0.04%	-14.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.06%	-7.69%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNVT	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.37%	12.46%	+34.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.37%	12.90%	+34.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.37%	12.35%	+35.02%

MNVT vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNVT vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNVT Moonvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNVT and WBIF in my portfolio?

MNVT and WBIF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNVT or WBIF?

On fees, MNVT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNVT or WBIF?

MNVT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNVT or WBIF?

WBIF has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.

What is the main difference between MNVT and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 1.25% for WBIF.