MNVT vs. VT
MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. MNVT is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
MNVT vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNVT
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | $653.57K | $816.73K | $1.17M |
| $317.04M | $378.09M | $471.57M |
MNVT vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 6.40% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNVT and VT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNVT vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
MNVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VT
MNVT vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNVT | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNVT vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNVT | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -50.27% | +26.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.74% | -2.88% | -20.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -6.98% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility
MNVT vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNVT | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.29% | 13.76% | +31.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.29% | 16.19% | +29.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.29% | 17.16% | +28.13% |
MNVT vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNVT vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNVT and VT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MNVT.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.
They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for MNVT and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer