PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNVT vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNVT vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MNVT

1D
-2.85%
1M
-6.54%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

POW

1D
-3.17%
1M
-11.84%
6M
22.43%
YTD
36.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$653.57K$816.73K$1.17M
$2.35M$2.29M$3.25M

MNVT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MNVT and POW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNVT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MNVT vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNVT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNVTPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-20.64%

-3.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.74%

-19.74%

-4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-5.02%

-3.49%

Volatility

MNVT vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNVTPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.29%

33.07%

+12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.29%

33.07%

+12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.29%

33.07%

+12.22%

MNVT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MNVT and POW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

MNVT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM2025
MNVT
Moonvest ETF
0.00%0.00%
POW
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF
0.14%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNVT and POW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNVT and POW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.

MNVT is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and VistaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNVT and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer