MNTS vs. LMT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MNTS (Momentus Inc.) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, MNTS returned -85.67%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for LMT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MNTS vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Momentus Inc. (MNTS) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNTS achieves a 79.88% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 3.26% return.

MNTS

• 1D: -15.36%
• 1M: 18.70%
• YTD: 79.88%
• 6M: -2.67%
• 1Y: -63.93%
• 3Y*: -86.16%
• 5Y*: -85.67%
• 10Y*: —

LMT

• 1D: -3.40%
• 1M: -6.83%
• YTD: 3.26%
• 6M: 3.28%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: 5.21%
• 5Y*: 8.40%
• 10Y*: 10.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNTS vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MNTS Momentus Inc.	79.88%	-96.56%	-67.26%	-95.56%	-81.34%	-76.73%	82.34%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	3.26%	2.47%	10.02%	-4.31%	40.48%	3.15%	-6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MNTS and LMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.07

Fundamentals

EPS MNTS : -$77.97 LMT : $20.61
PS Ratio MNTS : 3.87 LMT : 1.53
Total Revenue (TTM) MNTS : $1.03M LMT : $75.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) MNTS : $681.00K LMT : $7.37B
EBITDA (TTM) MNTS : -$28.93M LMT : $8.09B

Return for Risk

MNTS vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNTS

MNTS Risk / Return Rank: 33
MNTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MNTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MNTS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
MNTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MNTS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

LMT

LMT Risk / Return Rank: 48
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNTS vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Momentus Inc. (MNTS) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNTS	LMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	0.29	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	0.56	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.08	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	0.29	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	0.71	-1.73

MNTS vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNTS and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNTS vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNTS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTS and LMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNTS	LMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-79.29%	-20.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.53%	-26.58%	-63.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.94%	-31.79%	-68.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-100.00%	-31.79%	-68.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-26.58%	-73.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.99%	-26.83%	-49.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	62.60%	10.93%	+51.67%

Volatility

MNTS vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Momentus Inc. (MNTS) has a higher volatility of 106.28% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 8.79%. This indicates that MNTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNTS	LMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	106.28%	8.79%	+97.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	158.03%	20.75%	+137.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	214.80%	26.48%	+188.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	170.64%	23.13%	+147.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	153.15%	23.84%	+129.31%

Dividends

MNTS vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

MNTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	2.77%	2.76%	2.62%	2.68%	2.34%	2.98%	2.76%	2.31%	3.13%	2.32%	2.71%	2.83%
MNTS Momentus Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNTS and LMT in my portfolio?

MNTS and LMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNTS or LMT?

MNTS has higher volatility (106.28%) compared to LMT (8.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTS dropped -100.00% vs LMT's -79.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.