MNTS vs. CORZZ
MNTS (Momentus Inc.) and CORZZ (Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants) are both stocks. MNTS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CORZZ operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, MNTS returned -79.55% vs 78.97% for CORZZ. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MNTS vs. CORZZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTS achieves a -13.76% return, which is significantly lower than CORZZ's 55.71% return.
MNTS
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- YTD
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- -79.55%
- 3Y*
- -90.64%
- 5Y*
- -87.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -79.03%
CORZZ
- 1D
- 6.99%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 27.33%
- YTD
- 55.71%
- 1Y
- 78.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 161.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $124.86K | $161.79K | $560.80K | |
MNTS Momentus Inc. | $4.20M | $5.57M | $72.28M |
MNTS vs. CORZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MNTS Momentus Inc. | -13.76% | -96.56% | -30.03% |
CORZZ Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants | 55.71% | 3.71% | 601.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTS and CORZZ is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
MNTS:
$24.07M
CORZZ:
$7.25B
MNTS:
-$58.81
CORZZ:
-$4.47
MNTS:
2.46
CORZZ:
16.52
MNTS:
$1.03M
CORZZ:
$440.31M
MNTS:
$681.00K
CORZZ:
$124.45M
MNTS:
-$28.93M
CORZZ:
-$1.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNTS vs. CORZZ — Risk / Return Rank
MNTS
CORZZ
MNTS vs. CORZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Momentus Inc. (MNTS) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNTS | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.22 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.97 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 3.94 | -5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNTS vs. CORZZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CORZZ's maximum drawdown of -65.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTS and CORZZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTS | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -65.20% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -90.53% | -40.39% | -50.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -22.20% | -77.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.41% | -21.24% | -55.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.43% | 20.13% | +48.30% |
Volatility
MNTS vs. CORZZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Momentus Inc. (MNTS) is 26.77%, while Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ) has a volatility of 32.55%. This indicates that MNTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CORZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNTS | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.77% | 32.55% | -5.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.50% | 55.73% | +80.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.94% | 69.93% | +146.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.99% | 97.81% | +73.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 152.28% | 97.81% | +54.47% |
Dividends
MNTS vs. CORZZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither MNTS nor CORZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MNTS vs. CORZZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Momentus Inc. and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MNTS and CORZZ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORZZ has higher volatility (32.55%) compared to MNTS (26.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTS dropped -100.00% vs CORZZ's -65.20%.
CORZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNTS and CORZZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer