MNTS vs. SENS
MNTS (Momentus Inc.) and SENS (Senseonics Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. MNTS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while SENS operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, MNTS returned -87.35%/yr vs -39.37%/yr for SENS. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MNTS vs. SENS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTS achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly lower than SENS's -8.88% return.
MNTS
- 1D
- -10.40%
- 1M
- -31.47%
- 6M
- -43.59%
- YTD
- -16.84%
- 1Y
- -80.28%
- 3Y*
- -90.73%
- 5Y*
- -87.35%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -79.19%
SENS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- 6M
- -31.38%
- YTD
- -8.88%
- 1Y
- -48.55%
- 3Y*
- -34.36%
- 5Y*
- -39.37%
- 10Y*
- -21.96%
- ALL TIME*
- -22.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
MNTS Momentus Inc. | $4.26M | $6.14M | $71.22M |
| $2.16M | $2.59M | $4.70M |
MNTS vs. SENS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTS Momentus Inc. | -16.84% | -96.56% | -67.26% | -95.56% | -81.34% | -76.73% | 82.34% |
SENS Senseonics Holdings, Inc. | -8.88% | -47.27% | -8.19% | -44.65% | -61.42% | 206.26% | -4.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTS and SENS is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020 | 0.23 |
The correlation between MNTS and SENS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MNTS:
$23.21M
SENS:
$210.22M
MNTS:
-$58.81
SENS:
-$2.00
MNTS:
2.37
SENS:
5.24
MNTS:
$1.03M
SENS:
$42.36M
MNTS:
$681.00K
SENS:
$22.03M
MNTS:
-$28.93M
SENS:
-$72.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNTS vs. SENS — Risk / Return Rank
MNTS
SENS
MNTS vs. SENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Momentus Inc. (MNTS) and Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNTS | SENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.91 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.85 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -1.24 | +0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNTS vs. SENS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SENS drawdown of -95.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTS and SENS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTS | SENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -95.39% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -90.53% | -56.99% | -33.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.94% | -81.45% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -94.00% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -95.23% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.39% | -64.01% | -12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.21% | 38.71% | +29.50% |
Volatility
MNTS vs. SENS - Volatility Comparison
Momentus Inc. (MNTS) has a higher volatility of 27.28% compared to Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) at 11.26%. This indicates that MNTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNTS | SENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.28% | 11.26% | +16.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.58% | 55.17% | +81.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.48% | 73.94% | +141.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.91% | 89.05% | +81.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 152.32% | 93.31% | +59.01% |
Dividends
MNTS vs. SENS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MNTS nor SENS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MNTS vs. SENS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Momentus Inc. and Senseonics Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MNTS and SENS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNTS has higher volatility (27.28%) compared to SENS (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTS dropped -100.00% vs SENS's -95.39%.
MNTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNTS and SENS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer