MNST vs. AVDV
MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) is a stock, while AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Over the past 5 years, MNST returned 14.70%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for AVDV. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MNST vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 14.99% return.
MNST
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.17%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 41.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
MNST vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 21.08% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 8.87% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 14.99% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 11.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and AVDV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.34 |
The correlation between MNST and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNST vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
MNST
AVDV
MNST vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNST | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.12 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 12.44 | -5.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNST vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNST | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -43.01% | -26.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -13.19% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -14.17% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -28.08% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.24% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -6.76% | -13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 3.30% | +2.92% |
Volatility
MNST vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.50%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNST | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 6.26% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | 13.88% | +6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 16.25% | +10.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 17.41% | +7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 19.77% | +6.48% |
Dividends
MNST vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 4.11% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNST and AVDV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVDV has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNST and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer