PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNST vs. ADBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNST vs. ADBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly higher than ADBE's -41.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has outperformed ADBE with an annualized return of 13.79%, while ADBE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.72% annualized return.


MNST

1D
0.87%
1M
8.03%
YTD
21.08%
6M
25.50%
1Y
45.75%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
13.79%

ADBE

1D
-6.76%
1M
-13.58%
YTD
-41.71%
6M
-42.76%
1Y
-50.68%
3Y*
-24.76%
5Y*
-17.73%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNST vs. ADBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
21.08%45.87%-8.77%13.48%5.72%3.85%45.52%29.11%-22.23%42.74%
ADBE
Adobe Inc
-41.71%-21.29%-25.46%77.28%-40.65%13.38%51.64%45.78%29.10%70.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MNST and ADBE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.21

The correlation between MNST and ADBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNST:

$91.74B

ADBE:

$82.02B

EPS

MNST:

$2.06

ADBE:

$17.42

PE Ratio

MNST:

45.05

ADBE:

11.71

PEG Ratio

MNST:

3.52

ADBE:

0.83

PS Ratio

MNST:

10.41

ADBE:

3.36

PB Ratio

MNST:

10.51

ADBE:

7.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNST:

$8.79B

ADBE:

$25.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNST:

$4.88B

ADBE:

$22.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

MNST:

$2.70B

ADBE:

$9.68B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNST vs. ADBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNST
MNST Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ADBE
ADBE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ADBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNST vs. ADBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNSTADBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.73

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

-1.03

+3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

-1.99

+9.36

MNST vs. ADBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the ADBE Sharpe Ratio of -1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and ADBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNST vs. ADBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum ADBE drawdown of -79.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and ADBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNSTADBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.17%

-79.89%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-49.21%

+31.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-67.86%

+41.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-70.36%

+43.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

-70.36%

+39.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-70.36%

+70.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-25.99%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.22%

27.31%

-21.09%

Volatility

MNST vs. ADBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.50%, while Adobe Inc (ADBE) has a volatility of 16.64%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNSTADBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

16.64%

-11.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.03%

29.17%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.43%

35.08%

-8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.60%

36.54%

-11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

34.48%

-8.23%

Dividends

MNST vs. ADBE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNST nor ADBE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MNST vs. ADBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Adobe Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
2.35B
6.62B
(MNST) Total Revenue
(ADBE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MNST vs. ADBE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Monster Beverage Corporation and Adobe Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
55.0%
89.2%
Portfolio components
MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

ADBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 6.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

ADBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported an operating income of 2.24B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.

ADBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNST and ADBE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADBE has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs ADBE's -79.89%.

MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNST and ADBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer