PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNSO vs. ZVRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -28.13% return, which is significantly lower than ZVRA's 41.18% return.


MNSO

1D
-0.38%
1M
-11.56%
YTD
-28.13%
6M
-31.03%
1Y
-25.72%
3Y*
-5.77%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*

ZVRA

1D
-2.47%
1M
13.76%
YTD
41.18%
6M
51.86%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
-2.85%
10Y*
-16.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-28.13%-18.93%20.92%93.11%6.38%-60.35%8.16%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
41.18%7.43%27.33%42.70%-47.30%-22.23%3.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MNSO and ZVRA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNSO:

$4.03B

ZVRA:

$761.92M

EPS

MNSO:

CN¥6.65

ZVRA:

$2.16

PE Ratio

MNSO:

13.40

ZVRA:

5.85

PS Ratio

MNSO:

1.21

ZVRA:

5.94

PB Ratio

MNSO:

2.50

ZVRA:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥22.58B

ZVRA:

$122.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥10.10B

ZVRA:

$104.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥3.73B

ZVRA:

$149.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNSO vs. ZVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVRA
ZVRA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNSOZVRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.16

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

0.81

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

1.41

-2.35

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNSO Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the ZVRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNSO and ZVRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, smaller than the maximum ZVRA drawdown of -99.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and ZVRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNSOZVRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.58%

-99.27%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.47%

-43.47%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.05%

-43.47%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.24%

-74.01%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.44%

-96.65%

+40.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-86.41%

+40.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.33%

24.87%

+2.46%

Volatility

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is 9.60%, while Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) has a volatility of 24.56%. This indicates that MNSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNSOZVRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

24.56%

-14.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

40.23%

-17.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.85%

62.90%

-23.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.13%

60.49%

+6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.59%

81.46%

-12.87%

Dividends

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Dividend Comparison

MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, while ZVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
5.06%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MNSO vs. ZVRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Zevra Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.65B
36.22M
(MNSO) Total Revenue
(ZVRA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MNSO values in CNY, ZVRA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MNSO and ZVRA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVRA has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to MNSO (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNSO dropped -86.58% vs ZVRA's -99.27%.

ZVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNSO and ZVRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer