ZVRA vs. ASM
ZVRA (Zevra Therapeutics Inc.) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. ZVRA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, ZVRA returned -17.62%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for ASM. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ZVRA vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZVRA achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly higher than ASM's -13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ZVRA has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of -17.62%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.19% annualized return.
ZVRA
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -31.97%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- -14.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- -1.18%
- 10Y*
- -17.62%
- ALL TIME*
- -23.23%
ASM
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -18.35%
- 6M
- -40.33%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 1Y
- 66.08%
- 3Y*
- 95.22%
- 5Y*
- 38.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.80M | $17.78M | $25.63M | |
| $18.33M | $18.68M | $21.76M |
ZVRA vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZVRA Zevra Therapeutics Inc. | 6.14% | 7.43% | 27.33% | 42.70% | -47.30% | -22.23% | 84.70% | -78.71% | -56.05% | 37.29% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -13.62% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZVRA and ASM is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
ZVRA:
$562.18M
ASM:
$907.17M
ZVRA:
$2.15
ASM:
$0.22
ZVRA:
4.43
ASM:
23.85
ZVRA:
4.50
ASM:
7.95
ZVRA:
2.78
ASM:
3.35
ZVRA:
$122.29M
ASM:
$110.70M
ZVRA:
$104.94M
ASM:
$59.09M
ZVRA:
$149.15M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZVRA vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
ZVRA
ASM
ZVRA vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZVRA | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.19 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 1.30 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 2.33 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZVRA vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZVRA drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVRA and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZVRA | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.27% | -94.10% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.40% | -52.81% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.47% | -52.81% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.82% | -60.20% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.85% | -90.00% | -7.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.48% | -52.27% | -45.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -63.65% | -22.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.22% | 29.32% | -7.10% |
Volatility
ZVRA vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) has a higher volatility of 29.44% compared to Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) at 22.56%. This indicates that ZVRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZVRA | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.44% | 22.56% | +6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.17% | 63.44% | -14.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.35% | 82.98% | -17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.11% | 66.60% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.05% | 69.91% | +11.14% |
Dividends
ZVRA vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
ZVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.68% |
ZVRA Zevra Therapeutics Inc. | 0.00% |
Financials
ZVRA vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zevra Therapeutics Inc. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ZVRA and ASM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZVRA has higher volatility (29.44%) compared to ASM (22.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVRA dropped -99.27% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZVRA and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer