PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNSO vs. SEZL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNSO vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -28.13% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 109.06% return.


MNSO

1D
-0.38%
1M
-11.56%
YTD
-28.13%
6M
-31.03%
1Y
-25.72%
3Y*
-5.77%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*

SEZL

1D
3.00%
1M
29.59%
YTD
109.06%
6M
88.63%
1Y
-5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNSO vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-28.13%-18.93%20.92%4.18%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
109.06%48.89%1,146.59%-9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MNSO and SEZL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023

0.14

The correlation between MNSO and SEZL shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNSO:

$4.03B

SEZL:

$4.64B

EPS

MNSO:

CN¥6.65

SEZL:

$4.15

PE Ratio

MNSO:

13.40

SEZL:

32.00

PEG Ratio

MNSO:

0.08

SEZL:

0.06

PS Ratio

MNSO:

1.21

SEZL:

9.87

PB Ratio

MNSO:

2.50

SEZL:

23.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥22.58B

SEZL:

$480.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥10.10B

SEZL:

$426.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥3.73B

SEZL:

$193.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNSO vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SEZL
SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNSO vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNSOSEZLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.07

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.07

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-0.10

-0.84

MNSO vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNSO Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNSO and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNSO vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SEZL drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and SEZL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNSOSEZLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.58%

-89.95%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.47%

-72.02%

+20.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.44%

-27.15%

-29.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-40.29%

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.33%

53.61%

-26.28%

Volatility

MNSO vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is 9.60%, while Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a volatility of 17.41%. This indicates that MNSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNSOSEZLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

17.41%

-7.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

62.20%

-39.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.85%

87.49%

-47.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.13%

204.57%

-137.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.59%

204.57%

-135.98%

Dividends

MNSO vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, while SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
5.06%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MNSO vs. SEZL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.65B
135.54M
(MNSO) Total Revenue
(SEZL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MNSO values in CNY, SEZL values in USD

MNSO vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
43.3%
86.3%
Portfolio components
MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNSO and SEZL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEZL has higher volatility (17.41%) compared to MNSO (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNSO dropped -86.58% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

SEZL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNSO and SEZL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer