PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEZL vs. TMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEZL vs. TMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 152.46% return, which is significantly higher than TMC's -35.33% return.


SEZL

1D
-10.66%
1M
20.76%
6M
109.92%
YTD
152.46%
1Y
18.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMC

1D
-5.23%
1M
-26.52%
6M
-46.66%
YTD
-35.33%
1Y
-39.27%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEZL vs. TMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
152.46%48.89%1,146.59%-9.40%
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
-35.33%450.89%1.82%-12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SEZL and TMC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023

0.18

The correlation between SEZL and TMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEZL:

$5.39B

TMC:

$1.73B

EPS

SEZL:

$4.16

TMC:

-$0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEZL:

$480.91M

TMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEZL:

$426.79M

TMC:

-$136.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

SEZL:

$193.18M

TMC:

-$296.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEZL vs. TMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEZL
SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

TMC
TMC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMC Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEZL vs. TMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEZLTMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.99

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.63

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

-0.96

+1.36

SEZL vs. TMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the TMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEZL and TMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEZL vs. TMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, smaller than the maximum TMC drawdown of -95.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and TMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEZLTMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.95%

-95.58%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.53%

-62.68%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.55%

-67.95%

+55.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.49%

-79.19%

+39.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.31%

41.04%

+6.27%

Volatility

SEZL vs. TMC - Volatility Comparison

Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a higher volatility of 23.51% compared to TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) at 15.86%. This indicates that SEZL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEZLTMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.51%

15.86%

+7.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.34%

63.53%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.19%

94.27%

-8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

202.31%

112.49%

+89.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

202.31%

112.49%

+89.82%

Dividends

SEZL vs. TMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEZL nor TMC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SEZL vs. TMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sezzle Inc. Common Stock and TMC the metals company Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
135.54M
0
(SEZL) Total Revenue
(TMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SEZL and TMC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEZL has higher volatility (23.51%) compared to TMC (15.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs TMC's -95.58%.

SEZL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEZL and TMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer