SEZL vs. TMC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) and TMC (TMC the metals company Inc.) are both stocks. SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while TMC operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past year, SEZL returned 5.25% vs 63.07% for TMC. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SEZL vs. TMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 86.58% return, which is significantly higher than TMC's 5.19% return.

SEZL

• 1D: -3.35%
• 1M: 38.58%
• YTD: 86.58%
• 6M: 97.61%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMC

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 20.19%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: -12.30%
• 1Y: 63.07%
• 3Y*: 113.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEZL vs. TMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	86.58%	48.89%	1,146.59%	-74.69%
TMC TMC the metals company Inc.	5.19%	450.89%	1.82%	-5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SEZL and TMC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023	0.18

The correlation between SEZL and TMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SEZL : $4.14B TMC : $2.09T
EPS SEZL : $4.15 TMC : -$0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) SEZL : $480.91M TMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) SEZL : $426.79M TMC : -$136.00K
EBITDA (TTM) SEZL : $193.18M TMC : -$296.72M

Return for Risk

SEZL vs. TMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 44
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 42

TMC

TMC Risk / Return Rank: 60
TMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TMC Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
TMC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEZL vs. TMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEZL	TMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	0.61	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	1.63	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.18	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	0.73	-0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	1.23	-1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEZL vs. TMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the TMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEZL and TMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEZL	TMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	0.61	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	-0.07	+0.94

Drawdowns

SEZL vs. TMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, smaller than the maximum TMC drawdown of -95.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and TMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEZL	TMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.95%	-95.58%	+5.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.02%	-61.65%	-10.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-74.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.99%	-47.87%	+12.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.44%	-79.64%	+39.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.29%	36.86%	+16.43%

Volatility

SEZL vs. TMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) is 20.22%, while TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) has a volatility of 23.98%. This indicates that SEZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEZL	TMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.22%	23.98%	-3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.70%	69.66%	-7.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.79%	104.14%	-16.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	135.95%	113.10%	+22.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	135.95%	113.10%	+22.85%

Dividends

SEZL vs. TMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEZL nor TMC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEZL and TMC in my portfolio?

SEZL and TMC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEZL or TMC?

TMC has higher volatility (23.98%) compared to SEZL (20.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs TMC's -95.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.