PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNSO vs. AGI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNSO vs. AGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MNSO having a -29.00% return and AGI slightly higher at -27.72%.


MNSO

1D
-0.69%
1M
6.73%
6M
-27.88%
YTD
-29.00%
1Y
-29.50%
3Y*
-11.73%
5Y*
-2.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.10%

AGI

1D
-2.01%
1M
-8.18%
6M
-24.43%
YTD
-27.72%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
33.49%
5Y*
28.93%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
16.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.64M$126.71M$144.32M
$8.35M$8.46M$8.33M

MNSO vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-29.00%-18.93%20.92%93.11%6.38%-60.35%8.16%
AGI
Alamos Gold Inc.
-27.72%109.93%37.72%34.33%33.11%-11.00%-3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MNSO and AGI is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNSO:

$3.97B

AGI:

$11.69B

EPS

MNSO:

CN¥6.68

AGI:

$2.76

PE Ratio

MNSO:

13.13

AGI:

10.07

PEG Ratio

MNSO:

0.08

AGI:

0.07

PS Ratio

MNSO:

1.18

AGI:

5.32

PB Ratio

MNSO:

2.46

AGI:

2.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥22.58B

AGI:

$2.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥10.10B

AGI:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

MNSO:

CN¥3.73B

AGI:

$1.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNSO vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AGI
AGI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNSO vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNSOAGIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.09

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

0.30

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

0.70

-1.59

MNSO vs. AGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNSO Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the AGI Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNSO and AGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNSO vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, roughly equal to the maximum AGI drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and AGI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNSOAGIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.58%

-88.13%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.02%

-49.60%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.36%

-49.60%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.77%

-49.60%

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.97%

-49.60%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.85%

-37.77%

-8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.33%

21.26%

+12.07%

Volatility

MNSO vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison

MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) has a higher volatility of 13.29% compared to Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) at 11.71%. This indicates that MNSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNSOAGIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

11.71%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.55%

44.49%

-18.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.99%

54.01%

-13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.48%

41.86%

+24.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.12%

48.43%

+19.69%

Dividends

MNSO vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison

MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than AGI's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGI
Alamos Gold Inc.
0.47%0.26%0.54%0.74%0.99%1.30%0.74%0.66%0.56%0.31%0.29%1.22%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
5.12%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MNSO vs. AGI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MNSO vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Alamos Gold Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

AGI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 342.96M and revenue of 579.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

AGI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 345.99M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.8%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

AGI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 263.53M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in a net margin of 45.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNSO and AGI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNSO has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to AGI (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNSO dropped -86.58% vs AGI's -88.13%.

AGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNSO and AGI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer