PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGI vs. NGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGI vs. NGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AGI

1D
-2.01%
1M
-11.87%
6M
-24.43%
YTD
-27.72%
1Y
12.29%
3Y*
33.49%
5Y*
28.93%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
16.33%

NGD

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.64M$126.71M$144.32M

AGI vs. NGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGI
Alamos Gold Inc.
-27.72%109.93%37.72%34.33%33.11%-11.00%46.75%68.42%-44.49%-4.57%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
4.25%251.21%69.86%48.98%-34.67%-31.51%148.86%16.28%-77.00%-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AGI and NGD is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.55

The correlation between AGI and NGD shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AGI:

$2.76

NGD:

$1.61

PE Ratio

AGI:

10.07

NGD:

5.64

PEG Ratio

AGI:

0.07

NGD:

0.01

PS Ratio

AGI:

5.32

NGD:

3.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGI:

$2.21B

NGD:

$1.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGI:

$1.33B

NGD:

$758.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

AGI:

$1.75B

NGD:

$1.19B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGI vs. NGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGI
AGI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NGD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGI vs. NGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGINGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

AGI vs. NGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGI vs. NGD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGINGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.26%

Volatility

AGI vs. NGD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGINGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.43%

Dividends

AGI vs. NGD - Dividend Comparison

AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while NGD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGI
Alamos Gold Inc.
0.47%0.26%0.54%0.74%0.99%1.30%0.74%0.66%0.56%0.31%0.29%1.22%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AGI vs. NGD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and New Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AGI and NGD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGI and NGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer