MNDFX vs. YAFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. YAFFX is managed by AMG. It was launched on May 1, 1997.
Performance
MNDFX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 8.59% | 3.89% | 9.30% | 16.53% | -8.20% | 16.48% | 17.22% | 19.21% | 2.99% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
YAFFX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 11.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
YAFFX
MNDFX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.49 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 0.67 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.57 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 2.02 | +3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.49 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.41 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.67 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and YAFFX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.44% | 4.42% | 7.60% | 4.70% | 11.87% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 11.82% | 11.81% | 24.36% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and YAFFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -43.80% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -17.08% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -21.31% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -30.62% | -31.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -8.71% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -6.24% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 4.83% | -1.69% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 3.14%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 7.76% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 21.51% | -12.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 22.92% | -6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 17.85% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 16.39% | +5.28% |