MNDFX vs. PSECX
MNDFX (Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series) and PSECX (1789 Growth and Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX returned 5.55%/yr vs 7.34%/yr for PSECX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNDFX charges 0.54%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for PSECX.
Performance
MNDFX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than PSECX's 2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed PSECX with an annualized return of 5.55%, while PSECX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.34% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
PSECX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 6.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
MNDFX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 12.74% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 2.12% | 8.04% | 14.49% | 10.64% | -10.66% | 25.43% | 0.78% | 23.99% | -5.18% | 5.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and PSECX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2013 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MNDFX and PSECX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
PSECX
MNDFX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNDFX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.12 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 0.91 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.75 | 3.14 | +11.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than PSECX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and PSECX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -31.13% | -30.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -7.44% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.04% | -12.51% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -18.47% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -31.13% | -30.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -3.54% | +1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -3.87% | -8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.14% | -0.26% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) at 3.01%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.01% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 7.73% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 10.07% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 11.97% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 13.18% | +8.47% |
MNDFX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than PSECX's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 8.72% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 0.99% | 0.85% | 3.88% | 2.71% | 4.60% | 1.53% | 0.27% | 1.16% | 6.78% | 0.59% | 0.31% | 5.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNDFX and PSECX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNDFX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to PSECX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDFX dropped -62.03% vs PSECX's -31.13%.
MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNDFX and PSECX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer