MNDFX vs. NEIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. NEIMX is managed by Neiman Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2003.
Performance
MNDFX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 3.55% | 18.68% | 13.50% | 6.15% | -5.16% | 23.85% | -5.97% | 23.49% | -9.76% | 19.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than NEIMX's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.03% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
NEIMX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
NEIMX
MNDFX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.58 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.21 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.11 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 10.67 | -5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.58 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.02 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.02 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.03 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and NEIMX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than NEIMX's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 1.36% | 3.60% | 17.65% | 1.20% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 6.64% | 10.20% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and NEIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -92.94% | +30.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -10.78% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -92.94% | +75.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -92.94% | +30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -90.28% | +84.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -9.91% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.13% | +1.01% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 3.14%, while Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.41% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 8.30% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 15.57% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 576.30% | -561.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 407.62% | -385.95% |