MNDFX vs. HFCVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. HFCVX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Nov 1, 1996.
Performance
MNDFX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 8.31% | 18.27% | 9.59% | 5.81% | 6.12% | 29.94% | -6.39% | 20.84% | -9.50% | 19.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
HFCVX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 17.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
HFCVX
MNDFX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.97 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.57 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 6.83 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.93 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.65 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and HFCVX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than HFCVX's 6.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 6.83% | 7.39% | 4.56% | 3.57% | 10.33% | 4.81% | 2.58% | 6.58% | 17.16% | 14.97% | 2.26% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and HFCVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -65.75% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -11.00% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -16.81% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -39.39% | -22.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -2.27% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -8.28% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.60% | +0.54% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 2.92%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.92% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 6.80% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 12.75% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 13.27% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 16.48% | +5.19% |