MNDFX vs. FGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. FGINX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Oct 4, 1993.
Performance
MNDFX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 2.54% | 29.78% | 15.13% | 11.98% | 3.03% | 21.37% | -0.08% | 25.64% | -10.27% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than FGINX's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
FGINX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
FGINX
MNDFX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.77 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.38 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.28 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 9.83 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.77 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.99 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.70 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.53 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and FGINX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than FGINX's 11.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 11.08% | 11.28% | 12.40% | 7.11% | 7.04% | 11.97% | 6.59% | 51.75% | 25.36% | 5.13% | 4.12% | 5.66% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than FGINX's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and FGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -54.80% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -11.56% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -16.21% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -37.37% | -24.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -7.34% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -9.74% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.68% | +0.46% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 3.14%, while Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.56% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 8.83% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 16.14% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 14.86% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 17.03% | +4.64% |