PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNDFX vs. EXEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than EXEYX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed EXEYX with an annualized return of 5.24%, while EXEYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.


MNDFX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.57%
YTD
12.15%
6M
13.04%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
5.24%

EXEYX

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.81%
YTD
1.05%
6M
2.43%
1Y
10.60%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
12.15%15.76%11.60%5.64%-4.22%22.45%2.44%-28.95%-4.30%23.39%
EXEYX
Manning & Napier Equity Series
1.05%8.77%15.87%24.52%-19.51%25.41%23.74%33.64%-3.94%28.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MNDFX and EXEYX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between MNDFX and EXEYX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNDFX vs. EXEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNDFX
MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EXEYX
EXEYX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
EXEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EXEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNDFXEXEYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

0.80

+1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

1.18

+2.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.15

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

0.66

+3.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.05

2.20

+13.85

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the EXEYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDFX and EXEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNDFXEXEYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

0.80

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.43

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.70

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.49

-0.08

Drawdowns

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than EXEYX's maximum drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and EXEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNDFXEXEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-54.49%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-16.40%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-20.43%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-25.62%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

-32.30%

-29.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.10%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-7.86%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

4.92%

-3.05%

Volatility

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 2.55%, while Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNDFXEXEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

3.07%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

10.59%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

13.61%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

16.91%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

17.94%

+3.73%

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EXEYX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNDFX vs. EXEYX - Dividend Comparison

MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, less than EXEYX's 11.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXEYX
Manning & Napier Equity Series
11.14%11.26%11.88%3.11%13.28%16.60%8.31%10.39%20.49%7.57%4.98%44.53%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
8.77%9.64%10.46%7.81%9.77%7.31%1.93%5.18%15.02%24.95%4.89%15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNDFX and EXEYX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXEYX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to MNDFX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDFX dropped -62.03% vs EXEYX's -54.49%.

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNDFX and EXEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer