MNBAX vs. TSAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. TSAIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011.
Performance
MNBAX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | -5.91% | 20.04% | 15.46% | 22.72% | -19.57% | 17.10% | 19.69% | 27.97% | -11.27% | 22.35% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MNBAX having a -6.16% return and TSAIX slightly higher at -5.91%. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
TSAIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
TSAIX
MNBAX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.92 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.37 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.20 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.08 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 4.80 | -3.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.92 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.46 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.60 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and TSAIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than TSAIX's 7.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 7.84% | 7.38% | 2.94% | 1.81% | 9.27% | 11.82% | 5.59% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 1.13% | 4.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than TSAIX's maximum drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and TSAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -34.58% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -11.72% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -28.28% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -34.58% | +12.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -10.28% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -4.96% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.77% | -0.60% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) is 3.40%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that MNBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 5.29% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 9.81% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 17.09% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 16.15% | -6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 17.59% | -7.93% |