TSAIX vs. IBALX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) and Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX).
TSAIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011. IBALX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 1, 1994.
Performance
TSAIX vs. IBALX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSAIX vs. IBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | -5.91% | 20.04% | 15.46% | 22.72% | -19.57% | 17.10% | 19.69% | 27.97% | -11.27% | 22.35% |
IBALX Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund | -4.82% | 12.69% | 14.53% | 18.44% | -16.48% | 16.65% | 15.55% | 21.33% | -3.99% | 13.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSAIX achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly lower than IBALX's -4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TSAIX has outperformed IBALX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while IBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.
TSAIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
IBALX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSAIX vs. IBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSAIX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IBALX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSAIX vs. IBALX — Risk / Return Rank
TSAIX
IBALX
TSAIX vs. IBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) and Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSAIX | IBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.90 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 5.18 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSAIX | IBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.90 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.59 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.76 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.75 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSAIX and IBALX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TSAIX vs. IBALX - Dividend Comparison
TSAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.84%, more than IBALX's 6.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 7.84% | 7.38% | 2.94% | 1.81% | 9.27% | 11.82% | 5.59% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 1.13% | 4.12% | 7.19% |
IBALX Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund | 6.46% | 6.13% | 7.92% | 4.09% | 3.09% | 6.82% | 4.84% | 4.15% | 8.16% | 3.20% | 1.49% | 3.44% |
Drawdowns
TSAIX vs. IBALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSAIX drawdown since its inception was -34.58%, smaller than the maximum IBALX drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSAIX and IBALX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSAIX | IBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.58% | -43.33% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -7.60% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.28% | -23.64% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.58% | -23.64% | -10.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.28% | -6.08% | -4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -5.97% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.68% | +1.09% |
Volatility
TSAIX vs. IBALX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX) at 2.98%. This indicates that TSAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSAIX | IBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 2.98% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 5.67% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 10.95% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 11.44% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 11.46% | +6.13% |