MNBAX vs. TIBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. TIBIX is an actively managed fund by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 24, 2002.
Performance
MNBAX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -4.33% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 9.82% | 37.01% | 13.48% | 18.28% | -7.69% | 20.36% | -0.40% | 18.01% | -4.31% | 15.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -4.33% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 9.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
TIBIX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
TIBIX
MNBAX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 3.57 | -3.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.77 | 4.54 | -3.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.79 | -0.69 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 4.43 | -3.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 21.79 | -19.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 3.57 | -3.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.40 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.91 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.75 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and TIBIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.60%, more than TIBIX's 5.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.60% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 5.40% | 5.83% | 5.67% | 4.89% | 5.89% | 5.33% | 4.31% | 4.46% | 4.77% | 4.52% | 4.14% | 4.66% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and TIBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -48.88% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -8.58% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -20.79% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -34.85% | +12.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.10% | -3.47% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -6.00% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.75% | +0.47% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) at 3.68%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 3.68% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.55% | 6.57% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 10.83% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.42% | 11.11% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 13.48% | -3.80% |