MNBAX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
MNBAX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
SICIX
MNBAX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.66 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 2.20 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 2.19 | -1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 8.95 | -7.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.66 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.84 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.87 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and SICIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -27.62% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -2.73% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -10.94% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -11.61% | -10.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -2.39% | -6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -3.59% | -3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 0.67% | +1.50% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 1.24% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 2.06% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 3.66% | +6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 3.87% | +5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 3.89% | +5.77% |