MNBAX vs. CSTAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. CSTAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Sep 13, 2012.
Performance
MNBAX vs. CSTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. CSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
CSTAX American Funds College 2027 Fund | -0.65% | 9.00% | 5.57% | 6.57% | -9.87% | 6.52% | 7.66% | 13.35% | -2.23% | 11.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than CSTAX's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed CSTAX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while CSTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
CSTAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. CSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTAX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. CSTAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
CSTAX
MNBAX vs. CSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.73 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 2.47 | -1.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.35 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 2.23 | -1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 9.16 | -8.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.73 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.57 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.86 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.86 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and CSTAX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. CSTAX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than CSTAX's 5.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
CSTAX American Funds College 2027 Fund | 5.30% | 5.26% | 3.78% | 3.17% | 3.40% | 7.52% | 5.72% | 4.00% | 4.78% | 3.90% | 4.34% | 4.49% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. CSTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than CSTAX's maximum drawdown of -14.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and CSTAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -14.52% | -25.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -2.72% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -14.52% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -14.52% | -7.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -2.48% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -2.37% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 0.66% | +1.51% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. CSTAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX) at 1.32%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 1.32% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 2.05% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 3.47% | +6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 5.16% | +4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 5.82% | +3.84% |