MNBAX vs. CONWX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. CONWX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 3, 1987.
Performance
MNBAX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 8.18% | 11.95% | 13.58% | 0.20% | -2.51% | 19.73% | 8.76% | 16.84% | -1.95% | 7.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has underperformed CONWX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while CONWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
CONWX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
CONWX
MNBAX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.70 | -1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 2.36 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.99 | -1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 11.30 | -10.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.70 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.74 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.78 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and CONWX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than CONWX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 3.41% | 3.69% | 10.55% | 2.16% | 7.85% | 3.63% | 3.86% | 2.16% | 5.09% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than CONWX's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and CONWX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -26.09% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -8.60% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -12.49% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -26.09% | +4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -2.03% | -6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -2.78% | -3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.52% | +0.65% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 2.12%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 2.12% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 5.43% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 10.70% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 10.26% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 11.15% | -1.49% |