MMTM vs. XMVM
MMTM (State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MMTM returned 13.93%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for XMVM. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MMTM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
MMTM vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 13.93%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.
MMTM
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.00%
XMVM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 1Y
- 38.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $399.23K | $398.88K | $392.43K | |
| $2.16M | $2.04M | $1.98M |
MMTM vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 3.09% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 17.44% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMTM and XMVM is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.57 |
The correlation between MMTM and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MMTM vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMTM
XMVM
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
MMTM
XMVM
Communication Services
MMTM
XMVM
Industrials
MMTM
XMVM
Financial Services
MMTM
XMVM
Consumer Cyclical
MMTM
XMVM
Healthcare
MMTM
XMVM
Energy
MMTM
XMVM
Consumer Defensive
MMTM
XMVM
Utilities
MMTM
XMVM
Basic Materials
MMTM
XMVM
Real Estate
MMTM
XMVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMTM vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
MMTM
XMVM
MMTM vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMTM | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.91 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 12.52 | -8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMTM vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMTM | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -62.83% | +28.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | -9.18% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | -24.12% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | -24.12% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.85% | -45.07% | +11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.95% | -0.71% | -6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -10.20% | +6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.86% | +0.03% |
Volatility
MMTM vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.29%. This indicates that MMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMTM | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 3.29% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 9.25% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 14.85% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 21.24% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 22.74% | -4.03% |
MMTM vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMTM vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than XMVM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.90% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.79% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMTM and XMVM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMTM has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs XMVM's -62.83%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 13.93% vs 12.44% for XMVM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 13.93% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.90% for MMTM.
MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMTM and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer