PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMTM vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMTM vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 13.93%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.


MMTM

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.70%
6M
1.21%
YTD
3.09%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.93%
ALL TIME*
14.00%

XMVM

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.11%
6M
13.72%
YTD
17.44%
1Y
38.27%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$399.23K$398.88K$392.43K
$2.16M$2.04M$1.98M

MMTM vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
3.09%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
17.44%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and XMVM is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.57

The correlation between MMTM and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MMTM vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMTM
XMVM

Technology

42.6%
5.1%

Communication Services

11.4%
0.9%

Industrials

11.0%
11.7%

Financial Services

8.2%
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
14.8%

Healthcare

6.6%
2.5%

Energy

4.5%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
1.2%

Utilities

2.0%
8.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
4.9%

Technology

MMTM
42.6%
XMVM
5.1%

Communication Services

MMTM
11.4%
XMVM
0.9%

Industrials

MMTM
11.0%
XMVM
11.7%

Financial Services

MMTM
8.2%
XMVM
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MMTM
7.6%
XMVM
14.8%

Healthcare

MMTM
6.6%
XMVM
2.5%

Energy

MMTM
4.5%
XMVM
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

MMTM
2.7%
XMVM
1.2%

Utilities

MMTM
2.0%
XMVM
8.5%

Basic Materials

MMTM
1.8%
XMVM
0.8%

Real Estate

MMTM
1.6%
XMVM
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMTM vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMTM vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMTMXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.43

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.91

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

12.52

-8.76

MMTM vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTMXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-62.83%

+28.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-9.18%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-24.12%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-24.12%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-45.07%

+11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-0.71%

-6.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-10.20%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.86%

+0.03%

Volatility

MMTM vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.29%. This indicates that MMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTMXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

3.29%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

9.25%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.49%

14.85%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.34%

21.24%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

22.74%

-4.03%

MMTM vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMTM vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than XMVM's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.90%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.79%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMTM and XMVM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMTM has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 13.93% vs 12.44% for XMVM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 13.93% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.90% for MMTM.

MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMTM and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer