PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMTM vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMTM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MMTM having a 15.00% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.05%.


MMTM

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.46%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.58%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.00%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMTM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
9.16%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and VTI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012

0.78

The correlation between MMTM and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MMTM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMTM
VTI

Technology

29.5%
33.5%

Financial Services

16.0%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
10.0%

Healthcare

10.8%
9.2%

Communication Services

7.7%
10.3%

Industrials

7.6%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.7%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.4%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.0%

Energy

1.7%
3.7%

Technology

MMTM
29.5%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

MMTM
16.0%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MMTM
12.4%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

MMTM
10.8%
VTI
9.2%

Communication Services

MMTM
7.7%
VTI
10.3%

Industrials

MMTM
7.6%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

MMTM
6.7%
VTI
4.7%

Real Estate

MMTM
3.1%
VTI
2.4%

Utilities

MMTM
2.6%
VTI
2.3%

Basic Materials

MMTM
2.0%
VTI
2.0%

Energy

MMTM
1.7%
VTI
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMTM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMTM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMTMVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.17

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

14.62

-3.48

MMTM vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMTMVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.33

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.82

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.51

+0.34

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTMVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-55.45%

+21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-8.92%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-19.30%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-25.36%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-35.00%

+1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.72%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-8.03%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.93%

+0.25%

Volatility

MMTM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 2.35%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTMVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.96%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

9.13%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

12.17%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

17.40%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

18.30%

+0.35%

MMTM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MMTM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MMTM and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs 15.00% for MMTM. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 15.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for MMTM.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.

MMTM is categorized as Momentum, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMTM and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer