PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMTM vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMTM vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 14.83%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


MMTM

1D
-2.31%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
5.27%
6M
3.94%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
14.83%

SPYM

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMTM vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
5.27%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.21%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and SPYM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.78

The correlation between MMTM and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MMTM vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMTM
SPYM

Technology

32.3%
38.0%

Financial Services

15.1%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
9.4%

Healthcare

10.7%
8.5%

Communication Services

7.4%
10.1%

Industrials

7.3%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
4.6%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Energy

1.6%
3.1%

Technology

MMTM
32.3%
SPYM
38.0%

Financial Services

MMTM
15.1%
SPYM
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MMTM
12.1%
SPYM
9.4%

Healthcare

MMTM
10.7%
SPYM
8.5%

Communication Services

MMTM
7.4%
SPYM
10.1%

Industrials

MMTM
7.3%
SPYM
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

MMTM
6.2%
SPYM
4.6%

Real Estate

MMTM
3.0%
SPYM
1.8%

Utilities

MMTM
2.4%
SPYM
2.6%

Basic Materials

MMTM
1.9%
SPYM
1.8%

Energy

MMTM
1.6%
SPYM
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMTM vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMTM vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMTMSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.68

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

11.98

-3.56

MMTM vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTMSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-54.46%

+20.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-8.90%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-18.72%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-24.48%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-33.87%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

-3.14%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-7.14%

+2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.99%

+0.27%

Volatility

MMTM vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 4.15%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTMSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

4.83%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

9.83%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

12.46%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

16.90%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

18.03%

+0.63%

MMTM vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MMTM vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SPYM's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.88%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MMTM and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYM has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to MMTM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.61% vs 14.83% for MMTM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for MMTM.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.88% for MMTM.

MMTM is categorized as Momentum, while SPYM is S&P 500. MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMTM and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer