PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMSC vs. TMFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MMSC vs. TMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MMSC vs. TMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
0.11%15.45%22.19%18.76%-30.98%1.01%
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
-7.68%-1.59%15.41%25.40%-33.15%-5.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSC achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than TMFS's -7.68% return.


MMSC

1D
1.11%
1M
-6.37%
YTD
0.11%
6M
2.53%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
10Y*

TMFS

1D
0.45%
1M
-10.46%
YTD
-7.68%
6M
-5.98%
1Y
-1.25%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
-2.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMSC vs. TMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MMSC vs. TMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSC
MMSC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFS
TMFS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSC vs. TMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMSCTMFSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

-0.05

+1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

0.10

+1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.01

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

-0.05

+2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.91

-0.16

+8.07

MMSC vs. TMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the TMFS Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSC and TMFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMSCTMFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

-0.05

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.31

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between MMSC and TMFS is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MMSC vs. TMFS - Dividend Comparison

Neither MMSC nor TMFS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%2.37%5.57%2.65%

Drawdowns

MMSC vs. TMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSC drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum TMFS drawdown of -48.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSC and TMFS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MMSCTMFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-48.79%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.17%

-15.73%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-25.20%

+16.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.43%

-19.45%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

5.33%

-1.31%

Volatility

MMSC vs. TMFS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) at 6.93%. This indicates that MMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MMSCTMFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

6.93%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

14.49%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.45%

24.45%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

22.95%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.53%

25.64%

-1.11%